Skip to Content Skip to Navigation

What Is Carbon Farming?

What if there was a way to take the excess carbon dioxide (CO₂) out of the air and put it to good use?

Last edited 6 Jan 2025 Posted on 17 Dec 2024

LoamBio24 6583

What Is Carbon Farming?

Carbon farming is a way for farmers to help fight climate change by capturing carbon dioxide (CO₂) from the atmosphere and storing it in plants (i.e. trees), soil, or by reducing their farm’s greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Think of it as “growing” a carbon crop alongside their traditional crops. Farmers who do this can earn carbon credits, with each credit representing one tonne of CO₂ (or equivalent GHGs) that’s either captured or prevented from being released. These credits can then be sold, providing an additional income stream.

This approach not only benefits the environment by making farming more sustainable but also helps farmers diversify their income, putting agriculture at the center of climate solutions.

Carbon farming involves various practices that either store carbon (known as sequestration) or prevent emissions. This article focuses on soil carbon sequestration under Australia’s Carbon Credit Units (ACCUs) scheme, which is managed by the Clean Energy Regulator (body of the Australian government). Farmers can earn ACCUs by following the “Estimating soil organic carbon sequestration using measurement and models method”.

Eligible Management Activities

In a soil carbon project, farmers must adopt at least one new eligible management activity (full list of project activities), such as:

  1. Applying lime or gypsum
  2. Retaining stubble
  3. Addressing nutrient deficiencies
  4. Reducing tillage
  5. Growing legumes or cover crops

Harvesting Your Grain Crop vs. Your Carbon Crop

When farmers harvest grain, they produce something physical. Those who buy it can see, touch, and measure it to determine how much it’s worth per tonne. Carbon farming, on the other hand, is different. Carbon credits represent the process of removing carbon dioxide (CO₂) from the atmosphere and storing it in the soil. The carbon stays on the farm and the value lies in the environmental benefit, not in a physical product.

Unlike grain, carbon farming doesn’t involve a physical product that’s transported or stored. Instead, farmers measure their progress through soil sampling and analysis to prove how much carbon has been sequestered. This requires a more complex system of verification to ensure the credits represent real, measurable benefits to the environment. This makes carbon farming unique compared to traditional farming: it focuses on the value of an environmental process rather than a tangible product.

The Science Behind Carbon Farming

Building soil carbon is governed by a simple input-output equation:

Photosynthesis – Respiration = Net Sequestration

This equation encapsulates the carbon cycle in agricultural soils, influenced by many different factors, including climate (e.g., rainfall), agricultural practices (e.g., tillage), and type of soil. A simpler way of explaining this process is thinking of it like managing a bank account.

Deposits (Photosynthesis):

Plants are the depositors. During photosynthesis, green plants take in sunlight, water, and carbon dioxide (CO₂) and turn them into sugars. This carbon-rich “food” is then moved into the soil through:

  1. Root Exudates: Sugary liquids that roots release into the soil.
  2. Plant Residues: Decaying plant roots and shoots in the soil.

Withdrawals (Respiration):

Both plants and soil microorganisms withdraw carbon from the bank account. They use the plant’s carbon-based sugars for energy, breathing out CO₂ back into the atmosphere. The microorganisms can also break down these plant residues (roots and shoots) as an energy source.

Bank Balance (Net Sequestration):

Your account balance goes up when the deposits from photosynthesis outweigh the withdrawals from respiration. If more carbon goes into the soil than leaves it, then you get a build in soil carbon.

Soil Microorganisms

Microbes play two different roles, acting as both spenders and savers in this soil carbon economy:

  • Spenders: Release CO₂ through respiration, increasing the withdrawals.
  • Savers: Convert organic matter into more stable forms of soil carbon, reducing carbon loss.

Products like Loam Bio’s CarbonBuilder harness this microbial saving strategy.

The fungi in CarbonBuilder transport and store the plant carbon (deposits) in their own biomass, creating hyphal networks in the soil. Think of it like an underground web-like matrix. These structures help transport and protect carbon within soil aggregates (small soil clumps), while also helping carbon stick to soil minerals (mineral-associated organic carbon). All these things together reduce the spending of carbon through respiration, tipping the balance toward greater net sequestration.

Soil Moisture

Soil moisture acts as a crucial market condition in this carbon economy, influencing both deposits and withdrawals:

  • Higher Rainfall: Enhances plant growth (increasing deposits) but also boosts microbial activity (increasing withdrawals).
  • Lower Rainfall: Limited moisture can restrict both plant growth and microbial activities, leading to reduced deposits and withdrawals.

Agricultural Practices

Agricultural practices serve as financial management strategies for our soil carbon bank:

Reduced Tillage:

Acts like a savings lock on your account. When you minimize soil disturbance through no-till or reduced-till methods, you slow down the activity of soil microbes. With less oxygen available to them, these microbes can’t spend carbon as quickly by respiring it back into the atmosphere. As a result, more carbon remains stored in the soil, increasing the balance in your carbon account.

Cover Cropping:

By growing a variety of plants, you introduce different types of carbon into the soil—think of them as multiple currencies (yen, euros, dollars) that first need to be exchanged before being spent. This extra step slows down how easily microbes can break down and use the carbon. More time and complexity mean more carbon stays in the soil.

By adopting these practices, farmers can influence both the amount of carbon entering the soil and the amount being lost. This ultimately affects the overall balance of their soil carbon bank and thus the success of the carbon project.

Challenges and Solutions in Carbon Farming

Now that the underlying science of carbon farming is clear, it’s important to address a key challenge facing soil carbon projects in Australia: the risk of carbon loss during fallow periods—times when minimal plant growth occurs. When plant growth stalls, photosynthesis (carbon deposits) slows down or stops, but soil respiration (carbon withdrawals) continues (albeit at a lower rate), leading to net carbon losses.

Not All Soil Carbon Is Created Equal

One key insight is that soil carbon varies in stability. Some forms, like plant residues (e.g., visible stubble) that easily break down, can be lost between growing seasons. This temporary form of carbon is known as Particulate Organic Carbon (POC), which breaks down quickly, making it vulnerable during fallow periods.

Building More Stable Forms of Soil Carbon

Loam Bio’s CarbonBuilder technology focuses on increasing more resistant forms of soil carbon—those that are less likely to be lost during fallow periods. Soil carbon tests typically report Total Organic Carbon (TOC) as a single figure, but this total can be separated into different fractions (see details at Global Change Biology):

  1. Particulate Organic Carbon (POC): The least stable and easiest for microbes to break down.
  2. Aggregate Carbon (Agg-C): Carbon protected within soil aggregates, more resilient than POC.
  3. Mineral-Associated Organic Carbon (MAOC): Carbon bound tightly to mineral surfaces, making it the most resistant to loss.

Field trials have demonstrated that Loam Bio’s CarbonBuilder technology can increase both Agg-C and MAOC, which are less susceptible to loss than POC (the least stable form).

*Agg-C is also known as occluded POC (oPOC).

Research Validation

Researchers at Western Sydney University evaluated Loam Bio’s technology (study available at Biogeosciences).

These researchers inoculated wheat seeds with fungal isolates from Loam’s library and grew them in pots. After harvesting the wheat, soil samples were used in a 135-day soil incubation experiment. During this incubation, no new carbon was deposited, while microbial respiration (withdrawals) continued—simulating a fallow period.

They found that the soil that had been inoculated with the fungal treatments lost less carbon compared to the uninoculated controls. In fact, these treatments increased resistant soil carbon by up to 20.9% compared to the control. The study’s findings demonstrate that specific fungal treatments can improve soil carbon stability. By making the carbon more resistant, it can not only help buffer against carbon losses during the fallow but also the next cropping cycle.

The best performing isolate used in the study was isolate 12, which is the same isolate that is used in CarbonBuilder wheat and canola.

Agricultural Benefits of Building Soil Carbon

  • Enhanced Soil Aggregation: Higher soil organic carbon (SOC) levels improve soil structure, enhancing water infiltration and retention (source).
  • Drought Resistance: Better soil structure leads to reduced runoff and improved drought resistance, facilitating root growth and allowing plants to access water and nutrients more efficiently (source).
  • Enhanced Cation Exchange Capacity (CEC): SOC improves the soil’s ability to retain and supply nutrients, resulting in more efficient use of fertilisers and reduced nutrient leaching (source).
  • Lower Input Costs: Improved nutrient retention leads to lower fertiliser requirements, reducing input costs for farmers and environmental impact from excess nutrients.
  • Higher Crop Yields: Increased SOC is associated with higher crop yields. For example, wheat yields can increase by 20–70 kg/ha for every tonne/ha increase in SOC in the root zone (source).

Environmental Benefits of Carbon Farming

Carbon farming is not just good for farmers, it’s essential for the planet. By capturing and storing carbon dioxide (CO₂) in agricultural soils, it helps:

  1. Remove excess CO₂ from the atmosphere, reducing the impacts of climate change.
  2. Make farms more resilient to changing weather patterns.

Agriculture, forestry, and land use are responsible for about 23% of human-made greenhouse gas emissions, according to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). But there’s good news: sustainable farming practices, like carbon farming, have the potential to reverse some of this damage.

Globally, cropland soils have lost 20–60% of their total organic carbon (TOC), according to the IPCC. This loss makes farming less productive and more vulnerable to extreme weather. Carbon farming helps rebuild this lost carbon, improving soil health while tackling climate change.

As climate change threatens our food security with more extreme weather and unpredictable growing seasons, carbon farming offers a solution. By improving soil health, it increases resilience, helping farmers maintain crop yields and secure food production for the future—even under challenging conditions.

Getting Started with Carbon Farming

Starting a soil carbon project is a long-term commitment, ranging from 25 to 100 years. The length of these projects ensures that the environmental benefits are ongoing and aligned with the slow nature of soil carbon accumulation. It also provides ongoing incentives for sustainable land management practices, contributing to long-term agricultural sustainability and climate change mitigation (source).

How does a project work under the ACCU Scheme?

Source: Adapted from the Clean Energy Regulator Soil carbon projects Factsheet

 

Main steps in a carbon project

This stage is crucial for ensuring the project’s viability and compliance from the outset. It helps identify potential challenges, sets realistic expectations, and allows for strategic planning. Proper planning minimises risks and maximises the project’s potential for success.

  • Determine land eligibility.
  • Choose at least one new eligible management activity.
  • Project area mapping.
  • Develop a Land Management Strategy (LMS).
  • Estimate project returns and costs.

Official registration is essential for recognition under the ACCU scheme. It ensures the project meets all regulatory requirements and establishes a formal commitment to the carbon sequestration process. This step is critical for future crediting and provides a clear starting point for the project.

  • Estimate the total amount of carbon that will be sequestered (forward abatement estimate) in the project.
  • Prepare and submit the project to the Clean Energy Regulator (CER) for registration.

Baseline measurements provide a reference point against which future carbon increases and emissions can be measured. Implementing specific land management practices enables carbon sequestration. This phase is where the actual work of increasing soil carbon occurs, directly contributing to climate change mitigation and soil health improvement.

  • Establish baseline soil carbon levels and emissions.
  • Implement carbon-building land management practices.
  • Follow the rules under the ACCU scheme (comply with prohibited and restricted activities).

Regular measurement and reporting ensure the project’s progress is tracked and verified. Audits provide credibility and transparency, essential for the integrity of the carbon credit system. Earning credits is the tangible reward for the farmer’s efforts, providing financial incentives for sustainable practices.

  • Measure, report, and undergo audits to verify carbon sequestration.
  • Earn carbon credits based on accurate reporting.

Future of Carbon Farming

  • Permanence is a key factor in determining the quality of carbon credits. Credits from projects that ensure carbon remains sequestered for longer periods are considered more valuable and effective in mitigating climate change (source). In Australia, the ACCU Scheme currently offers two permanence periods for soil carbon projects: 25 years and 100 years.
  • Companies are increasingly aware of the reputational risks associated with low-quality carbon credits and the potential backlash from greenwashing accusations. This has led to a trend of companies seeking credits from projects with strong permanence guarantees (source).
  • Machine learning, combined with remote sensing data, can cut the number of soil samples required to measure a farm’s carbon levels, which is currently a costly and time-consuming process (source).
  • These innovations can cut the costs of measuring soil carbon levels, enabling more frequent monitoring. This real-time data allows farmers to assess the impact of new management practices or technologies on carbon sequestration rates.

Where does Loam Bio fit into carbon farming?

Loam partners with farmers to run soil carbon projects under the ACCU scheme – this forms the basis of their SecondCrop offering. This program provides farmers with two options: SecondCrop Pro and SecondCrop Premium (source).

In the SecondCrop Premium option, Loam manages project registration, setup, soil sampling, analysis, and auditing for the farmer. Meanwhile, the SecondCrop Pro option requires farmers to organise and finance the ongoing soil sampling, analysis, and auditing costs themselves. Under the Premium and Pro options, growers retain 70% and 82.5% of the ACCUs generated, respectively. These ACCUs can be banked, used to offset their own emissions (insetting), or sold.

This partnership model simplifies the complexities of running a carbon project, allowing farmers to focus on their core farming business. The shared credit model aligns interests, encouraging both parties to maximise carbon sequestration.

In both SecondCrop options, farmers can access CarbonBuilder technology, which enables them to build both aggregate carbon (Agg-C) and mineral-associated organic carbon (MAOC)—the most stable forms of soil carbon. Building stable carbon is important for the long-term success of projects in the ACCU scheme, as these projects run for up to 25 to 100 years. Over these lengthy timelines, periods of below-average rainfall are almost inevitable, posing challenges to maintaining soil carbon stocks.

Research from both academic collaborations and Loam Bio’s internal studies shows the importance of building stable soil carbon to reduce losses during fallow periods. The results have demonstrated that CarbonBuilder technology decreases soil carbon losses compared to the control, meaning growers are more likely to retain more of the carbon they build.

“At Loam, we prioritise quality over quantity in carbon removal. By building the most stable forms of soil carbon, we position ourselves in the premium carbon farming segment. Carbon buyers can trust that the carbon sequestered with our technology will remain in the soil for the long term.”

Guy Hudson (Co-founder & CEO at Loam)

Conclusion

Carbon farming represents a transformative opportunity for agriculture, turning farms into carbon sinks. By sequestering carbon in soil and adopting sustainable practices, farmers not only improve their land’s productivity and resilience but also contribute to global environmental solutions. Programs like Loam Bio’s SecondCrop make carbon farming accessible and effective, providing farmers with the tools, technology, and support needed to succeed in long-term carbon projects.

As the world faces mounting climate challenges, carbon farming offers a scalable, science-backed pathway to reduce greenhouse gases, improve soil health, and secure food production for the future. By investing in stable forms of soil carbon and leveraging innovative solutions, farmers can drive meaningful change while reaping economic and environmental rewards.

References

1 Angelopoulou, T., Psomiadis, E., & Petropoulos, G. P. (2019). Remote sensing techniques for soil organic carbon estimation: A review. Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment, 13, 212–232. see text

2 Birch, H.F. (1958). The effect of soil drying on humus decomposition and nitrogen availability. Plant and Soil, 10(1), 9-31. see text

3 Bossio, D. A., Ellis, P. W., Fargione, J., Sanderman, J., Smith, P., Wood, S., Zomer, R. J., von Unger, M., Emmer, I. M., & Griscom, B. W. (2020). The role of soil carbon in natural climate solutions. Nature Climate Change, 10, 750–756. see text

4 Haddaway, N. R., Hedlund, K., Jackson, L. E., Kätterer, T., Lugato, E., Thomsen, I. K., Jørgensen, H. B., & Isberg, P.-E. (2017). How does tillage intensity affect soil organic carbon? A systematic review. Environmental Evidence, 6(1). see text

5 Hoyle, F., & Baldock, J. (2022, February). Building soil carbon for your business. Grains Research and Development Corporation. see text

6 IPCC. (2019). Climate Change and Land: An IPCC Special Report on climate change, desertification, land degradation, sustainable land management, food security, and greenhouse gas fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems. see text

7 Jansson, C., Faiola, C., Wingler, A., Zhu, X.-G., Kravchenko, A., de Graaff, M.-A., Ogden, A. J., Handakumbura, P. P., Werner, C., & Beckles, D. M. (2021). Crops for Carbon Farming. Frontiers in Plant Science, 12. Source

8 Kollmuss, A., Zink, H., & Polycarp, C. (2008). Making sense of the voluntary carbon market: A comparison of carbon offset standards. WWF Germany. see text

9 Lal, R. (2004). Soil carbon sequestration impacts on global climate change and food security. Science, 304(5677), 1623-1627. see text

10 Lal, R. (2006). Enhancing crop yields in the developing countries through restoration of the soil organic carbon pool in agricultural lands. Land Degradation & Development, 17(2), 197-209. see text

11 Lal, R. (2020). Soil organic matter and water retention. Agronomy Journal, 112(5), 3265-3277. see text

12 Lei, X., Shen, Y., Zhao, J., Huang, J., Wang, H., Yu, Y., & Xiao, C. (2023). Root Exudates Mediate the Processes of Soil Organic Carbon Input and Efflux. Plants, 12(3), 630. see text

13 Oldfield, E. E., Bradford, M. A., & Wood, S. A. (2019). Global meta-analysis of the relationship between soil organic matter and crop yields. Soil, 5(1), 15-32. see text

14 Paustian, K., Lehmann, J., Ogle, S., Reay, D., Robertson, G. P., & Smith, P. (2016). Climate-smart soils. Nature, 532(7597), 49-57. see text

15 Six, J., Elliott, E. T., & Paustian, K. (2000). Soil structure and organic matter: I. Distribution of aggregate-size classes and aggregate-associated carbon. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 64(2), 681-689. see text

16 Smith, P., Martino, D., Cai, Z., Gwary, D., Janzen, H., Kumar, P., McCarl, B., Ogle, S., O'Mara, F., Rice, C., Scholes, B., Sirotenko, O., Howden, M., McAllister, T., Pan, G., Romanenkov, V., Schneider, U., Towprayoon, S., Wattenbach, M., & Smith, J. (2008). Greenhouse gas mitigation in agriculture. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 363(1492), 789-813. see text

17 Smith, P., Soussana, J. F., Angers, D., Schipper, L., Chenu, C., Rasse, D. P., Batjes, N. H., van Egmond, F., McNeill, S., Kuhnert, M., Arias‐Navarro, C., Olesen, J. E., Chirinda, N., Fornara, D., Wollenberg, E., Álvaro‐Fuentes, J., Sanz‐Cobena, A., & Klumpp, K. (2020). How to measure, report and verify soil carbon change to realize the potential of soil carbon sequestration for atmospheric greenhouse gas removal. Global Change Biology, 26(1), 219-241. see text

18 Stuart, E. K., Castañeda-Gómez, L., Buss, W., Powell, J. R., & Carrillo, Y. (2024). Non-mycorrhizal root-associated fungi increase soil C stocks and stability via diverse mechanisms. Biogeosciences, 21(4), 1037–1059. see text